Project: Bogus 0.0.3

Publisher: bogus

Introduction to Bogus

Bogus is a library that aims to reduce the risks associated with isolated unit testing.

The problem

It is not uncommon to encounter code like this in isolated unit tests:

it "returns the average score" do
  scores = stub(get: [5, 9])
  students = stub(all: ["John", "Mary"])

  report_card = ReportCard.new(scores, students)

  report_card.average_score.should == 7
end

NOTE: In the above example we use mocha syntax, but this patten is common
to all the major mocking frameworks

The test above not only ensures that ReportCard can calculate the average score for all the students, but it also specifies how this class will interact with its collaborators and what those collaborators will be.

This style of testing enables us to practice so called programming by wishful thinking. We can implement ReportCard and get it to work before it's collaborators are implemented. This way we can design our system top-down and only implement what we need. This is a Very Good Thing(tm).

However, the same freedom that comes from not having to implement the collaborators, can quickly turn against us. Once implement ReportCard, what test will tell us that Scores and Students are not implemented yet?

The kind of stubbing that you see in the example above requires us to write integrated or end-to-end test just to make sure that the objects we implemented fit together. This is a problem, because those tests can be quite slow and hard to set up in a way that covers all the integration points between our objects.

Another problem is that it's quite likely that Students and Scores will be collaborating with more objects than the ReportCard. If so, you will find yourself typing code like this over and over again:

students = stub(all: ["John", "Mary"])

This is duplication. It is also a problem, because if you decide to change the interface of the Students class, suddenly you will have to remember every place you created that stub and fix it. Your tests won't help you, because they don't have any idea what the Students interface should look like.

The solution

Bogus makes your test doubles more assertive. They will no longer be too shy to tell you: "Hey, you are stubbing the wrong thing!".

Let's reexamine our previous example, this time Bogus-style:

it "returns the average score" do
  students = fake(:students, get: [5, 9])
  scores = fake(:scores, all: ["John", "Mary"])

  report_card = ReportCard.new(scores, students)

  report_card.average_score.should == 7
end

Can you spot the difference? Not much, huh?

However, the code above will not only make sure that the ReportCard works, it will also make sure that classes Students and Scores exist and have an interface that matches what you stub on them.

DRY out your fake definitions

By now you know how Bogus can help you with making sure that your stubs match the interface of your production classes. However, the attentive reader has probably spotted a problem with the solution above already. If all you need to change in your tests is the word stub to fake and give it some name, then how is that any better when it comes to scattering the fake interface definition all over your specs?

The answer is: it's just slightly better. The reason it's better is that you only need to ever stub methods that return meaningful values. Let us explain.

Tell-don't-ask methods

Let's say we have a PushNotifier class:

class PushNotifier
  def notify_async(messages)
  end
end

Now if you test an object that collaborates with our PushNotifier, you would do something like this:

fake(:push_notifier)

it "send push notifications when comment is added" do
  comment_adder = CommentAdder.new(push_notifier)

  comment_adder.add("Hello world!")

  push_notifier.should have_received.notify_async("Comment: 'Hello world!' added.")
end

While not really impressive, this feature is worth mentioning because it will eliminate a lot of the mocking and stubbing from your tests.

Global fake configuration

Bogus also has a solution for DRYing stubbing of the methods that return values. All you need to do is to provide a reasonable default return value for those methods in the global fake configuration.

  Bogus.fakes do
    fake(:students) do
      all []
    end

    fake(:scores) do
      get []
    end
  end

Now you will only need to stub those methods when you actually care about their return value, which is exactly what we want.

Contract tests

Bogus is not the only mocking library to implement fakes and safe mocking. However, it is the first library to implement the concept of contract tests as defined by J. B. Rainsberger.

Let's start with an example:

stub(scores).get(["John", "Mary"]) { [5, 9] }

We already know that Bogus makes sure for us that the Scores class exists, has a get method and that this method can be called with one argument.

It would also be nice to know that the input/output that we stub makes sense for this method.

Contract tests are an idea, that whenever we stub Scores#get with argument ["John", "Mary"] to return the value [5, 9], we should add a test for the Scores class, that calls method get with those same arguments and have the same return value.

A contract test like that could look like this:

it "returns scrores for students" do
  scores = Scores.new(redis)
  scores.add("John", 5)
  scores.add("Mary", 9)

  scores.get(["John", "Mary"]).should == [5, 9]
end

Obviously Bogus won't be able to write those tests for you. However it can remind you if you forget to add one.

To add contract test verification, the only thing you need to do is add the line:

verify_contract(:students)

to your tests for Students class.

Not only for people who use Dependency Injection

The examples above all have one thing in common: they assume that your code has some way of injecting dependencies. We believe it should, and that's why we wrote Dependor.

However, we are aware that this practice is not very common in the Ruby community. That's why Bogus supports replacing classes with fakes.

Let's assume, that you have production code like this:

class PushNotifier
  def self.notify_async(message)
    # ...
  end
end

class CommentAdder
  def self.add(parent, comment)
    PushNotifier.notify_async("comment added")
    # ...
  end
end

You can test it easily, with all the benefits of fakes, safe stubbing and contracts:

describe CommentAdder do
  fake_class(PushNotifier)

  it "should send a push notification" do
    CommentAdder.add("the user", "the comment")

    PushNotifier.should have_received.notify_async("comment added")
  end
end

describe PushNotifier do
  verify_contract(:push_notifier)

  it "notifies about comments asynchronously" do
    PushNotifier.notify_async("comment added")

    # ...
  end
end

Last published over 7 years ago by Adam Pohorecki.